AV2: field_tags is labeled "Tags Old" and hidden on video, but live "Tags" on audio

Area: migration / AV / content model Raised during: Session 2026-09-08/09 (building AV2/AV4), never revisited Jira: (add when available) Priority: Low — migrates as-is, nothing broken; a naming/intent question for AV staff, not an implementation gap

What happened

D7's field_tags field is configured inconsistently across AV's two bundles: on video it's labeled "Tags Old" and hidden from display; on audio it's live, labeled plainly "Tags." Per AV2's decision (two D11 bundles, one shared field definition, migrated faithfully rather than "improved" per ADR 008/010), this inconsistency migrates as-is — D11's audio/video both carry the field with whatever data D7 has, following D7's own display config per bundle.

Nobody has asked what this actually means: is "Tags Old" on video genuinely retired/superseded content (in which case hiding it in D11 too might be the right call), or is it a labeling accident that left real, useful tag data hidden on video nodes while the equivalent field stayed visible on audio?

Recommendation

Ask AV staff / Than what "Tags Old" actually refers to on the video bundle — retired taxonomy, a renamed/replaced field, or just an inconsistently-maintained label — and whether D11's video display should follow D7's hidden treatment (as it does now) or align with audio's visible one.

Related

docs/planning/av-node-migration-notes.md §8; av4-paragraph-ordering-ties.md, av4-84-und-en-content-differences.md, av4-field-pbcore-language-iso639-conversion.md, raised in the same sessions.